Sunday, November 23, 2008

Contaminated food 2

Another article from the trib - primarily on nut/dairy allergens in Whole Foods chocolate bars, but also has some gluten stuff. Seems like they're going after Whole Foods labeling right now.

www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-112308-allergens-whole-foods-nov23,0,241722.story

chicagotribune.com

A recipe for disaster

Whole Foods' handling of chocolate bar shows how warnings fail.
Search our database of recalled food

By Sam Roe

Tribune reporter

November 23, 2008

Whole Foods Market has long trumpeted its premium chocolate bars for being made the old-fashioned way, in Switzerland.

But two years ago it added another manufacturing claim to the product's labels—one that would appeal to millions of Americans who suffer from potentially life-threatening food allergies.

"Good manufacturing practices," the labels stated, were "used to segregate" potential allergens such as tree nuts, soy or milk.

The labels were informative, comforting and also untrue.

A Tribune investigation found that the chocolate bar was, in fact, manufactured in a way that posed a risk to people with allergies.

In 2007, a year after the "good manufacturing" label was put on the bars, a child with food allergies had a reaction after eating the candy, which contained tree nuts. Two recalls followed and the label was changed earlier this year.

But identical wording remains on hundreds of other products in Whole Foods' brand lines such as 365 Everyday Value and Whole Kitchen, leaving consumers in the dark about whether these items pose an allergen risk.

The story of the Whole Foods chocolate bars is just one example of how consumers are at the mercy of a food chain with little accountability and labels that are not policed for accuracy.

Getting any single product on the shelves of any grocery store may involve a dozen firms and suppliers, each one not entirely certain of the other's health standards. Even companies such as Whole Foods that market themselves as a healthier choice may know little about the safety of their products.

One key threat: cross-contamination, which is when certain ingredients inadvertently end up in other products during the harvesting or manufacturing process.

By law, ingredient labels must disclose whether products contain major allergens, but they do not have to warn about allergens that might slip into food.

In recent years a soaring number of companies have voluntarily put cross-contamination warnings on their products.

But the Food and Drug Administration found that some firms were using these labels to protect themselves from lawsuits, not simply to help consumers. The FDA has urged companies to not rely solely on labels and instead try to prevent cross-contamination by taking steps such as cleaning assembly-line equipment.

Now the agency is studying whether tougher policies are needed to ensure warning labels are uniform and not misleading.

Such measures might have prevented what Whole Foods did with labels on its chocolate bars and dozens of other products.

Whole Foods' "good manufacturing" label is one of the few that puts a positive spin on the possibility of cross-contamination, according to Steve Taylor, a leading allergy expert and director of the allergen laboratory at the University of Nebraska.

"If you are going to do that," he said, "you had better have your act together 110 percent of the time."

Walk down any Whole Foods aisle and you're bound to see products with labels boasting of "good manufacturing" practices.

Though they are gone from Whole Foods chocolate bars, the Tribune found such labels on more than 300 products in one of the chain's west suburban stores, including snack mixes, chips and cookies—foods prone to the kind of cross-contamination that is a major cause of allergic reactions.

Based on reading the label, for example, a consumer with a wheat allergy might consider buying Whole Foods' Blue Corn Tortillas because its label promises that "good manufacturing practices [were] used to segregate ingredients in a facility that also processes milk, wheat and soy ingredients."

But the reality is that segregating wheat from that product is difficult at best. Just ask Mike McCabe, a sales executive for Bueno Foods, the Albuquerque firm that manufactures the tortillas for Whole Foods.

Wheat dust in the tortilla plant "is really impossible to segregate" from non-wheat products, McCabe said.

Bueno cleans equipment and uses separate assembly lines for different products, he said. But wheat dust is so tiny and prevalent at the plant, he added, that "I could be breathing in wheat dust right now, and I'm two buildings away, in an office."

Whole Foods acknowledged the tortilla labels are problematic. The chain's director of private brand development, Nona Evans, said that in January the company conducted routine testing on the tortillas and found trace amounts of gluten, which is a protein of wheat, rye or barley. The company decided to place warning stickers on the product until new packaging could be made, she said.

But the Tribune found that many tortillas currently for sale have neither warning stickers nor new packaging with the proper language—10 months after Whole Foods said it discovered the problem.

Company officials could not explain why some tortillas aren't properly labeled.

Even so, Evans said Whole Foods' allergen-control practices are effective. "We sell millions of individual products each year, and the number of substantiated allergen related-incidents that we see are in the single digits," she said.

Whole Foods defended its move in early 2006 to place the "good manufacturing" language on nearly all its branded products. The goal, Evans said, was to offer customers information about the manufacturing facilities.

"We tend to over-inform our consumers so they can have as much transparency into our products as possible," she said.

Whole Foods continues to use the "good manufacturing" statement on many other items, Evans added, "because they are products that are not necessarily so allergy sensitive."

But allergy experts say any amount of hidden allergens, in any kind of food, can cause a potentially deadly reaction.

When asked if Whole Foods is confident that its blanket "good manufacturing" claim was accurate for each of those products, Evans initially said: "With the quality assurance program that we have in place today, yes, we are very confident."

In a later interview, though, she acknowledged that Whole Foods has been conducting a review of its products that began within the last two years to see if label changes are in order—a process, she said, that will take another year.

"Our 365 Organic Everyday Value Swiss Milk Chocolate is made in Switzerland, using slow, traditional Old-World conching, or blending methods," the label reads in part. ". . . All of our cocoa beans are grown organically in the Dominican Republic by a co-op of small farmers."

This is another way of saying that, like most food store chains, Whole Foods uses a web of contractors to produce its private label offerings.

In the late 1990s, an Arizona company Spruce Foods began importing the candy from Switzerland and selling it to Whole Foods.

About the same time, representatives from both the importer and Whole Foods together toured the Swiss plant, run by Chocolat Bernrain, according to Norm Petersen, co-owner of Spruce Foods. He said they saw that products were made on the same production line without cleaning in between. That meant ingredients from one product could easily end up in another.

But no warnings to that effect were put on the labels.

In the summer of 2002, a 2-year-old girl with a known milk allergy ate a piece of a Swiss Dark Chocolate bar. The toddler started coughing, said her throat hurt and broke out in hives.

After her mother gave her Benadryl, the girl recovered and the episode was reported to the FDA. Eight weeks later, that bar and eight variations under the Whole Foods Organic Swiss label were recalled for hidden milk and nuts.

Warnings were added. The problem went away, but not for long.

In early 2006, Whole Foods placed the new "good manufacturing" allergen statement on nearly all of its private-brand products. Within days, at least two consumer complaints were lodged with the FDA over the confusing nature of that warning language. One parent of a girl allergic to peanuts and tree nuts wrote: "How does one interpret this kind of information?"

Despite Whole Foods' claim, the Swiss factory still manufactured different products on the same line.

Then, last year, a child had an allergic reaction to a Swiss Milk Chocolate with Rice Crisps bar. Whole Foods tested the bars and found hidden hazelnuts, walnuts and pecans.

Whole Foods sent the test results to its importer, Spruce Foods, which contacted the Swiss manufacturer.

"And the manufacturer said, 'Why is anyone surprised?' " Petersen recalled. Nothing had changed. The Swiss still took few precautions to prevent allergens from slipping into its products, he said.

On Dec. 14, Whole Foods announced a recall of a limited number of just the Milk Chocolate with Rice Crisps bars. The grocery chain immediately tested other varieties of its Organic Swiss chocolate bars, finding similar problems. So a week later, Whole Foods again recalled eight varieties of the candy bars, 1.1 million in all.

"They watered down the disclosure, and it bit them in the backside," said Petersen. He blamed new personnel at Whole Foods for the decision. "They likely had never been over in that plant," he said. (Whole Foods officials could not say who from the chain visited the factory.)

In January, a Whole Foods staffer inspected the Swiss factory and concluded the equipment was so difficult to clean that hidden allergens were unavoidable. So the chain earlier this year rewrote the allergen statement and put warning stickers on the bars.

The stickers state the candy "may contain" certain allergens. But even this raises questions about whether the warnings should be stronger. A spokesman for the Chocolat Bernrain factory, Jost Ruegg, said it is "almost impossible" to avoid cross-contamination in the facility. "There are 19 chocolate manufacturers in Switzerland," he said, "and all of them are confronted with this."

The Tribune sent a Whole Foods Organic Swiss Dark Chocolate bar to the Nebraska lab. The candy's label said the bar "may contain" tree nuts and milk, and test results showed that it did. (Tests on the Whole Foods tortillas for gluten, meanwhile, came back non-detect.)

Whole Foods said that when it became aware it had a problem with its chocolate-bar labels, the company removed similar language from all chocolate products.

But the Tribune found several Whole Foods chocolate products still being sold with the "good manufacturing" label, including solid chocolate chips, chocolate chunk pieces, hot chocolate mix, chocolate chip cookies, chocolate ice cream bars and chocolate torte.

Informed of the Tribune's findings, Evans said the labels on four of those six products were appropriate because the items were so carefully manufactured and tested that they were virtually immune to hidden allergens. But she acknowledged that the ice cream bars and cookies were not so carefully made and that those products would soon be getting new labels.

Evans emphasized that Whole Foods collects detailed allergen-related information, such as the likelihood of cross-contamination, on all of its manufacturers and suppliers. And, she added, Whole Foods and third-party auditors inspect factories for allergen problems.

Asked why such scrutiny did not catch fundamental problems at the Swiss candy factory, she said, "It's a continual education."

sroe@tribune.com

Friday, November 21, 2008

Watch Out For Hidden Gluten!!


chicagotribune.com

ALLERGY THREAT: A TRIBUNE INVESTIGATION

Children at risk in food roulette

Mislabeling, lax oversight threaten people with allergies
Search our database of recalled food

By Sam Roe

Tribune staff reporter

November 21, 2008

American children with food allergies are suffering life-threatening--and completely avoidable--reactions because manufacturers mislabel their products and regulators fail to police store shelves, a Tribune investigation has found.

In effect, children are used as guinea pigs, with the government and industry often taking steps to properly label a product only after a child has been harmed.

The Tribune investigation revealed that the government rarely inspects food to find problems and doesn't punish companies that repeatedly violate labeling laws.

In disclosing ingredients, labels must clearly identify major allergens such as peanuts, milk, eggs and wheat. Millions of parents, teachers and baby-sitters scrutinize these labels to ensure that they are not giving children unsafe food.

But an alarming number of products sold as allergen-free actually contain harmful amounts, the Tribune found.

Many of the problems occur with foods marketed to children--candy, cookies, cakes and ice cream. Iconic childhood favorites such as Oreos, Pop-Tarts, Frosted Flakes, Jello-O and Campbell's Spaghettios have been recalled for hidden allergens in recent years.

An estimated 30,000 Americans require emergency-room treatment and 150 die each year from allergic reactions to food. A large percentage were children, researchers say.

To determine the full scope of the problem, the Tribune created an unprecedented computer database of 2,800 recalls related to food allergies over the last 10 years. The newspaper found that roughly five products a week are recalled because of hidden allergens, making it one of the top reasons any consumer product in America is recalled.

But that doesn't mean the government or companies are vigilant.

Take the example of Peggy Pridemore, a Kentucky woman who bought Wellshire Kids' Dinosaur Shapes Chicken Bites because her son Patrick has a severe wheat allergy. Bold letters on the packaging said the item was "gluten free," or contained no wheat, rye and barley proteins.

After Patrick, then 3, ate the nuggets in December, he started coughing, his eyes swelled and he had trouble breathing. His mom jabbed his leg with a large needle containing epinephrine, a drug to help him breathe, then raced him to the hospital, where he recovered in the emergency room.

Pridemore said she contacted both the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the food manufacturer and that neither offered to test the chicken nuggets.

The Tribune recently bought the product on two occasions at a River Forest supermarket and sent the samples to one of the nation's leading food-allergy labs, at the University of Nebraska. Both times, the lab found gluten. The item remains on shelves across the U.S.

"I'm stunned it hasn't been recalled," Pridemore said. "I thought somebody somewhere would do something."

Recalls swell, but mislead

The nation has seen a mysterious rise since the 1990s in the number of children with food allergies, now estimated to be 3 million kids, or 1 in every 25 children.

As awareness has skyrocketed so have recalls. But they are voluntary. Food companies themselves--not regulators--decide whether to do so. If they do, the companies work with regulators to coordinate the recalls and issue news releases to inform the public.

Yet the official recall statements by the Food and Drug Administration often downplay the true risks or lack basic information, such as where the tainted products were sold. One reason for the soft pedaling: The FDA allows the food companies to write their own recalls.

A recent recall statement, for instance, read more like an advertisement than a warning. "While the product is good and wholesome," it stated, "these soups may contain wheat or soy as ingredients not identified on the label."

In many cases, the government and companies never inform consumers. The Tribune found that nearly half of the allergy-related recalls in the last 10 years were not announced to the public. This was true even in dozens of cases where the FDA classified products as likely to cause serious harm or death.

Alarms sounded by consumers seldom result in products being pulled.

The Tribune examined 260 complaints to the FDA since 2001 where people with known food allergies--many of them children who had to be treated at hospitals--reported a reaction from products they claimed were mislabeled. Yet just 7 percent resulted in recalls.

Even when authorities concluded a product was at fault, the regulatory wheels moved slowly. On average, it took 32 days to issue a recall.

In one case, a girl, 14, with a known milk allergy was taken to the emergency room after eating muffins made from Duncan Hines chocolate chip mix. The illness was reported to the FDA, but the distributor, Pinnacle Foods, did not recall the mix until seven months later.

When asked by the Tribune why the recall took so long, Pinnacle said it immediately had the product tested but found no milk. A few months later, the company received a second complaint of an allergic reaction to the mix. Pinnacle said it investigated, this time finding a likely culprit overlooked before: a batch of chocolate chips.

Many manufacturers test their products for allergens and have set up special assembly lines to prevent cross-contamination. But other companies, particularly small ones with limited resources, acknowledge taking limited precautions.

Others do little or no testing, and the government does not require them to do so.

The FDA, which oversees the vast majority of packaged foods, said it trusts firms to police themselves.

The USDA, which regulates meat, poultry and egg products, is even more lax. It said it never tests for undeclared allergens, such as eggs or peanuts, because these ingredients by themselves are not prohibited foods--ignoring the fact that products containing hidden allergens are potentially illegal and deadly.

Testing shows risk

This broken system leaves families vulnerable.

Pridemore recalled how she bought Wellshire Kids' dinosaur-shaped chicken nuggets, made by New Jersey-based Wellshire Farms, because the item specifically claimed to be gluten free. She also found the same claim on the Wellshire Farms Web site.

After her son had the severe reaction to the nuggets, she took some to his allergist, who ran tests, including gently rubbing a nugget on the boy's arm to see if it would cause a small welt. It did, and the allergist concluded the nuggets were to blame for his full-blown reaction.

Pridemore contacted the USDA, which sent agency investigator Michael Maxwell to her home just outside Cincinnati. He took photos of the package, but did not test the nuggets for undisclosed allergens.

The investigator also obtained a copy of a brief, unsigned in-plant inspection report, which found no problems with the nuggets. He later acknowledged to the Tribune he wasn't sure who wrote the report--another USDA inspector or a plant worker. The report said workers routinely sent the nuggets out to a lab for testing. The report stated that those lab results, from last fall, "were all negative for gluten."

In an e-mail in January, Maxwell indicated to Pridemore that in light of that inspection report and the fact that no other consumer had complained, no action would be taken. "You may want to have the product tested," he wrote, according to a copy of the e-mail exchange.

Pridemore said she was taken aback that the USDA suggested she test the food herself. But she sent the remainder of the nuggets in her freezer to the Nebraska lab.

The results showed high amounts of gluten. So she e-mailed a copy of the findings to the USDA and reminded Maxwell that the product advertises itself as gluten free.

The investigator wrote back that the government had "archived your complaint." The investigation went no further, according to Pridemore. She also e-mailed the test results to Wellshire Farms. The company, she said, never responded.

In May, several weeks after Maxwell told Pridemore her complaint was archived, a second child with a known wheat allergy-- Timmy Osterhoudt, 5, of Lemoore, Calif.--had a severe reaction after eating the same product, his mother said.

"He said, 'Mommy, I don't want to die!' " Michelle Osterhoudt recalled. "I told him, 'Mommy won't let you die.'."

She jabbed him with the epinephrine needle and raced him to the military hospital on the base where the family lives. There, he recovered.

Like Pridemore, Osterhoudt sent the chicken bites to the Nebraska lab for testing. Again, the results showed high amounts of gluten. She said she complained to Wellshire Farms, USDA and FDA, but to no avail.

USDA spokeswoman Amanda Eamich said one reason it did not ask Wellshire Farms to recall the chicken bites is because the agency did not trust the consumers' testing results. The consumers had sent samples of chicken nuggets from opened packages, raising the possibility that the product was contaminated somewhere between their homes and the lab.

Pridemore said it was the USDA's job--not consumers--to test samples from unopened packages.

"I'm not a doctor. I'm not a scientist," she said. "I'm just a mom trying to keep her child safe."

The Tribune recently bought two samples of the chicken nuggets and sent them to the same Nebraska lab. Both tested positive for gluten--including a sample from an unopened box.

The nuggets, said Steve Taylor, the lab's director and a leading allergy expert, "are not safe for people with wheat allergies or celiac disease," often characterized by chronic abdominal pain.

The newspaper also tested two other Wellshire Kids' products: the "Gluten Free" Chicken Corn Dogs and the "Gluten Free" Beef Corn Dogs, finding high amounts of gluten in both.

Wellshire Farms owner Louis Colameco said his products are safe. But he said that in light of the two consumer complaints and recent moves by regulators to tighten "gluten-free" rules, he halted production of the three Wellshire Kids' products in June.

Colameco said he would start making the food again when he finds a supplier who can guarantee that the batter used in the products is gluten free. The old supplier, he said, could not give such an assurance.

He said he has not recalled the Wellshire Kids products still on store shelves because he believes they are in compliance with federal regulations.

But weak and murky federal rules on gluten leave food companies wiggle room and consumers at risk.

The USDA, which has jurisdiction over meat-based products such as chicken nuggets, said it has no policy specifically addressing "gluten-free" claims. The agency must approve labels before products go to market, and packaging claims are reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

The FDA's rules are tougher. Though the agency has no specific rule for "gluten-free" products, the agency's policy generally is that absent a standard, products claiming to be "free" of an ingredient cannot contain it.

Recognizing that food companies may interpret these rules as they wish, the FDA has pushed a proposed rule that products advertised as "gluten-free" must contain less than 20 parts per million of gluten. A UN health panel this summer recommended a similar standard. Tribune tests of Wellshire products all far exceeded those levels.

Apart from online sales, the Wellshire Kids' gluten-free products are sold exclusively at Whole Foods Market, the upscale chain.

Whole Foods said it was investigating the issue, but that it was the supplier's responsibility, not Whole Foods', to ensure the Wellshire products are safe and legal.

Tribune reporters Annie Slezickey and Jason Grotto contributed to this report.

sroe@tribune.com

Copyright © 2008, Chicago Tribune

Who Doesn't Love Pumpkin?

Gluten Free Pumpkin Bars

Keep in mind this is a dessert and is not altogether healthy because of the sugar content! (But it sure is yummy! :)

2 large eggs
1/3 c. oil
1 c. light brown sugar, packed (can use a combo of agave nectar and sugar)
1 c. canned pumpkin
2 t. vanilla extract
1 3/4 c. Pamela's Baking and Pancake Mix
1 t. cinnamon
1/2 t. ginger

¼ t. cloves
1/3 c. cup finely chopped walnuts or pecans (optional)


Preheat the oven to 350 degrees. Grease a 9×13-inch baking pan.

Beat the eggs; add the oil and beat to combine. Add the brown sugar and mix until smooth. Add the pumpkin and vanilla, beat until well mixed. Add the baking mix and spices and mix just until the batter is smooth. Add in the nuts (optional) and stir by hand to combine. Pour the batter into the baking pan and spread evenly. Bake for about 20 to 25 minutes or until the bars are firm and a wooden pick inserted into the center emerges clean. Cool on a wire rack. Frost when cool. Below is a dairy free option for frosting, but I prefer a cream cheese frosting (3 oz. cream cheese, 2 t. vanilla, 2-3 c. powdered sugar, almond or soy milk if needed for consistency).


Brown sugar frosting: 4t. butter, 1/4c. brown sugar (stir over med heat) when bubbles, remove from heat, cool slightly. Add 1t.vanilla, ¼ t. nutmeg, ½ t. cinnamon, mix. Add 2c. powdered sugar as needed to thicken frosting.


Sunday, November 9, 2008

How about Dessert?

Never thought the word, "Toll House" would be uttered around our house again. This is an incredible recipe I adapted from Pamela's website.



Toll House Style Chocolate Chip Cookies

1/2 c. butter
1 c. brown sugar or similar sweetener
2 eggs
2 t. vanilla
3 c. Pamela's Baking and Pancake Mix
2 c. semi sweet chocolate chips
1 c. chopped nuts--optional--used macadamia nuts. Pecans or walnuts would be good too.
1/4-1/2 c. flax seeds (for extra nutrition)

Cream butter and sugar, add egg and vanilla and beat. Add Pamela's mix slowly and then add the chocolate chips and nuts. Place on lightly greased cookie sheet and flatten. Bake at 325 degrees for approx. 12-15 minutes. Let cookies cool slightly and use a spatula to remove from cookie sheet. **I put all the dough into a 9x13 pan and baked for about 20 minutes or until lightly golden brown. Can also freeze dough after flattening; just lengthen bake time a few minutes as they can be baked from frozen state.

Monday, November 3, 2008

Pumpkin Pancakes

1 ¾ c. Pamela's Baking and Pancake Mix

1/3-1/2 c. canned pumpkin

1 c. almond milk

2 T. oil

3 T. agave nectar

¼ t. cinnamon

¼ t. cloves

¼ t. ginger

2 eggs

Mix and cook pancakes until done.